Nuclear war heads count

Malini Shreedharan Recent estimates by international nuclear watchdogs and reputed
thinktanks hold that Pakistan has a total of 70 to 90 warheads compared
to India's 60 to 80. China, in comparison, has around 240 warheads......so what next?
Thursday at 17:19 · Comment · LikeUnlike
Natesa Iyer, Kashmir Pahal, Vinay Calling and 22 others like this.
Praveen Khandelwal
Praveen Khandelwal
Let the Govt. take a note of it and take effective actions to arm itself with sufficient numbers of warheads....taking into account of the same with China and Pak
Thursday at 17:21 ·
Mohinder Thakur
Mohinder Thakur
Hello how are you doing
Thursday at 17:21 ·
Vijaynath Viswanathan
Vijaynath Viswanathan
Looks like you read the Times of India without fail.
Thursday at 17:21 ·
Amit Sharma
Amit Sharma
next they will discover that indian ones are chinese made and they dont work.......
Thursday at 17:22 ·
Dilip Mehta
Dilip Mehta
dangerous 4 us .cant trust pak.a china both .but sorry to say soft policy of congress hurt national interest.
Thursday at 17:23 ·
Vishal Pratap Singh
Vishal Pratap Singh
It doesn t matter when couple of warheads are enough to wipe out entire nation ... only a foolish country uses nuclear weapons.
Thursday at 17:25 ·
Chavali Venkata Laxminarasimha Phani
Chavali Venkata Laxminarasimha Phani
we have very string cultural, spiritual .....warheads (knowledge)..no energy can destroy it since 000s of years many many..tried to distroy it but failed after looting some extent..but grassroots are still with us ..SO .BHARAT MATA KI JAI.
Thursday at 17:26 ·
Chavali Venkata Laxminarasimha Phani
Chavali Venkata Laxminarasimha Phani
DARE TO SAY VANDE MATARAM...
Thursday at 17:26 ·
Swarupmay Majumdar
Swarupmay Majumdar
a country which begs food and basics for day to day basis, can keep so much war heads! Actually its a global market of arsenal, some big countries are making everyone fool..in one hand they give subsidy, ration, ..in another hand gives all deadly arsenals.
Thursday at 17:27 ·
Najmal Almelkar
Najmal Almelkar
these are estimates and not real facts...india is a silent water,which runs deep...india is much much much powerful than pak any day....
Thursday at 17:28 ·
Satyen Sharma
Satyen Sharma
its bad even if they have one .. bcoz its in bad hands
Thursday at 17:30 ·
Malini Shreedharan
Malini Shreedharan
I hate indian stand, we will not be the first! As Vishal and other said, in war wins come to one who hits it first! yes nuclear arms are not for fools like jehadis or some militants; when pakisthan has them the danger of world lies there.
Thursday at 17:31 ·
Devender Kumar
Devender Kumar
No need to woory. This is hardly a difference. These are weapons of Deterrence and 80 is credible deterrence. In history till date only two nuclear warheads has been used operationally. The cause of bigger wiorry is thay are not safe in Pakistan andd are likely to be misused by terrorists
Thursday at 17:31 ·
Malini Shreedharan
Malini Shreedharan
But US is not fool...............Pakisthan will be finished by US only who feed them and train them with these arsenals. I feel sorry for so many of my innocent FB friends and others from Pakisthan
Thursday at 17:32 ·
Gautam Unny
Gautam Unny
makes no difference one is enough to end the world..
Thursday at 17:34 ·
Malini Shreedharan
Malini Shreedharan
This is an unfair race to finish themselves, See Pakisthan is supposed to be the epitome of Universal terrorism and in their own home pakisthanis are not safe, they are also suffereing. this means, innocent people will suffer everwhere
Thursday at 17:35 ·
Najmal Almelkar
Najmal Almelkar
can you elobrate little more malini...?SORRY for what...??
Thursday at 17:35 ·
Malini Shreedharan
Malini Shreedharan
I feel sorry for so many of my innocent FB friends and others from Pakisthan
Thursday at 17:36 ·
Zaheer Abbas
Zaheer Abbas
Malini no one will use these nuclear weapons cos these r equally r may be more dangerous for even themselves who uses it.so cheer up and sing some song hope ur voice is as beautiful as u
Thursday at 17:43 ·
DrMukesh Garg
DrMukesh Garg
so where we are heading...increasing warheads will establish peace..!!
Thursday at 17:47 ·
Amit Sinha
Amit Sinha
The balance of power and counting of weapons of mass destruction hardly matter as pressing of Nuclear button on either end will trigger such a horrifying trail of destruction and wiping out habitant on both side of fence that nothing will be remained to be reconstructed. What is really terrifying is in case of failing of State of Pakistan which ... See moreis of higher probability the nuclear bomb may fall in hand of Terrorist who will immediately use it.

Systemetic phasing out of all Nuclear Arsenal at the disposal of all countries of Nuclear Club is most required thing which No Government will sincerly try to do and it can be only possible through movement of citizen of all country together in a manner to put maximum presuure in their respective country.
Thursday at 17:50 ·
Mohamed Ali Yusuf Ravat
Mohamed Ali Yusuf Ravat
ONLY COUNTRY THAT WILL USE THE NUCLEAR WEAPONS WILL BE THE TERRORIST ZIONIST APARTHEID STATE OF ISRAEL BECAUSE USA WILL STOP SUPPORTING THE REAL TERRORIST ISRAEL SOON . THEY WILL REALISE THEY HAVE CREATED ANOTHER SADDAMS IRAQ.
Thursday at 17:51 ·
Swarupmay Majumdar
Swarupmay Majumdar
everything possible, no wonder.
Thursday at 17:53 ·
Chavali Venkata Laxminarasimha Phani
Chavali Venkata Laxminarasimha Phani
we are habituated and immune to live with the enemy and unless and until our policies change..attack and destroy our enemy ..but our soft corner and SHANTI paath made and feel our enemy ..make us fools..so we are loosing oir beloved ones now and then...i like ur stand..one should be strong to kill ..finish their enemy..should not leave or left even their identity...that kind of spirit and policy..we require..
Thursday at 17:58 ·
Chanddra Kanth D
Chanddra Kanth D
India might be strong in conventional warfare and pakistan may not be able to survive for more than a few days with conventional warfare. That is the worry India needs to address cos a nation like Pakistan when under threat will not think twice to go against the " No First Use " Policy and might just press the Nuclear trigger and that will cause wide spread damage. When anyone is under threat quite naturally they will use All options available with them.
Thursday at 18:00 ·
Chavali Venkata Laxminarasimha Phani
Chavali Venkata Laxminarasimha Phani
let us remember SWAMI VIVEKANANDA...where are those steel- iron muscles...wake up and realise them the time is running very fast ...our YOUTH ....sleeping and always running behind...then who care for their own...Mother LAND...being an Indian....it is everybody's responsibility....
Thursday at 18:02 ·
Manoj K Yadav
Manoj K Yadav
Don't worry. Nothing will happen. India is going on the right path. Be relaxed.
Thursday at 18:12 ·
Bhawani Singh
Bhawani Singh
D day when we bomb each other...cuz even thou we are keeping it as deterrent to first use , but pakis and chinese are allies soon they will bomb us at same time ..nope not before 21 DEC 2012...
Thursday at 18:16 ·
Kajol Singh
Kajol Singh
dump them all together into a giant crater and fill it up with garbage, and seclude a 20 km radius.
Thursday at 18:16 ·
Manoj K Yadav
Manoj K Yadav
Jo darr gayaa so mar gayaa, so No worries!!!!! Be happy.
Thursday at 18:19 ·
Jasjeet Josan
Jasjeet Josan
finally man has made something he is afraid to use!!!kill himself
Thursday at 18:19 ·
Chanddra Kanth D
Chanddra Kanth D
@ Kajol... had a similar thing been done a few decades back instead of the stupitidy of one of our great leader of going to the UNO for peace mission, life would have been much better and many of the wives of our brave Indian soldiers would not have been widows now..
Thursday at 18:24 ·
Namrata Shah
Namrata Shah
The basic problems facing the world today are not susceptible to a military solution.
Thursday at 18:31 ·
Inder Bisht
Inder Bisht
so many nuclear warheads are irrelevant when only a few of them are enough to annihilate a whole nation.......the fact of mutual destruction will always act as an effective detterent for the countries to use against each other..however that many warheads could be proliferated to rogue elements ..and thats a real spooky scenario
Thursday at 18:32 ·
Jaffer Rather
Jaffer Rather
@zahi: Exactly, I m convinced.
Thursday at 18:37 ·
Tarun Aggarwal
Tarun Aggarwal
thats serious
Thursday at 18:38 ·
Rakesh Gangwar
Rakesh Gangwar
It all depend on how powerful each one. Next is nothing just create havoc in other country through terrorism, naxlism and many more ...isms.
Thursday at 19:11 ·
Anuarg Kalia
Anuarg Kalia
its bad even if they have one .. bcoz its in bad hands...
thats serious
Thursday at 19:14 ·
Malini Shreedharan
Malini Shreedharan
It seems Indian war heads are ready! But all wars are futile. they never helped grow rice, never saved a life, never made a house for a human being..and they only spread hatred. The competitions for growing up as nuclear nations and incresing arsenals will end up with of the world!
Pakisthan has enough of their own issues to address than ... See moreunnecessarily worrying about indian attacks.
I never thnk indian nuke can ever go to some ones hand who will not bother to blast himself also.
We paid a lot for being peaceful and stay in peace, but sometimes it shows like as if we are compromised. I mean we need warheads but need them to be in secure hand. becoz everything boomerangs
Thursday at 19:59 ·
Malini Shreedharan
Malini Shreedharan
Thank you all for jining in this wall post
Thursday at 19:59 ·
Magdum Ismail-Magdum
Magdum Ismail-Magdum
Sir. No doubt, on the basis of Russian-American cold war hostility and evidence that under any circumstances, these nuclear war heads are not likely to be used against each other. In fact the people of the subcontinent has no point to worry and threaten by these nuclear weapons. Therefore, the investment to produce nuclear weapons are their national waste and diversion of peoples' welfare funds. Alas! Jai Hind.
Thursday at 20:00 ·
'Nadia Choudhary'
'Nadia Choudhary'
@Namrata "The basic problems facing the world today are not susceptible to a military solution."
you said it so elegantly.
@ others, so many wars begin in the minds of men. If we think enemy, then we feel enemy and treat others as enemy, then we will get the response.

If we think of peace/love/friend, feel peace/love/friend then we will treat others as peace/love/friend....what do you think could happen?... See more
BE THE CHANGE, IT STARTS WITH YOU.
Thursday at 20:02 ·
Manish Bajpai
Manish Bajpai
u think this is a true numbers? neither india nor any country can describe their war heads total figure.
Thursday at 20:04 ·
Malini Shreedharan
Malini Shreedharan
We had always been peaceful and we need no changes NADIA : the time has come that whole universe accept pakisthan as the epicentre of all terrorism and just wipe off , spaing some good heated and peaceful pakisthanis
Thursday at 20:05 ·
Malini Shreedharan
Malini Shreedharan
being nuclear and having one warhead is sufficient. numbers play no game.
Thursday at 20:06 ·
'Nadia Choudhary'
'Nadia Choudhary'
Are you sure, because I'm look at the UN record of Human Rights abuses by India over the years...it's not telling that, Malini.
Thursday at 20:07 ·
Malini Shreedharan
Malini Shreedharan
Nadia, human rights violence are individual matters, it is happening inside in our own houses too. But when some one plans and makes things ready for completely wiping off another nation, the other nation needs to think well ahead and just take action.
Thursday at 20:09 ·
Malini Shreedharan
Malini Shreedharan
Why do Pakisthan need Nuclear heads?? what do they have?? they live on American help.
Thursday at 20:11 ·
'Nadia Choudhary'
'Nadia Choudhary'
Really Malini? ok, maybe for you, but for me, Human Rights violations are an issue for all HUMANS. Who's making plans? Really Malini, did they come and share their plans with you?

I think what we have to worry about it irresponsible people who don't even value human rights becoming leaders. They are pathologically sick if they do not feel the ... See morepain for other human beings. That's what people like us need to figure out. I'm suprised you being a female! Females give life, in evolution, not think about how to end it. That's historically what males have been good at.
Thursday at 20:20 ·
Sodhi Paminder
Sodhi Paminder
When ABomb fell on Hiroshima,Sankichi Toge was in his house.In August 1951,he wrote a poem:



GIVE BACK THE HUMAN... See more
Give back my father,give back my mother;
Give grandpa back,grandma back;
Give me my sons and daughters back.

Give me back myself.
Give back the human race.
As long as this life lasts,this life,
Give back peace
That will never end.. ..
Thursday at 20:21 ·
Gurmel Singh Sra
Gurmel Singh Sra
Marvelous, Parminder!
Thursday at 21:16 ·
Rajan Deshpande
Rajan Deshpande
Well just a thought,,,, If i get 1000 people to kill a person, whose strength is it mine or his?
Thursday at 21:22 ·
'Nadia Choudhary'
'Nadia Choudhary'
This is the spirit the world needs....
"We have got to understand, they are us and we are them.."
RIP beautiful angel Rachel Corrie xx
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fUGjzxG5r9Q
Thursday at 21:30 ·
Prabaharan Gandhi
Prabaharan Gandhi
UNO should keep ,open record on the matter and take effective step in bringing down year by year and non nuclear countries security be taken care of by UNO.
Thursday at 21:46 ·
Mian Saleem
Mian Saleem
Malini - Nuclear weapon is a deterent. It keeps both the parties at bay, therefore u dont have to worry as none of the countries are going to use it becasue they know the distruction it wil bring to them. If Japan had this weapon during WWII then Amercia would not have dared to use it. It can only be used next time if other party is weak and lacks nuclear weapon or the world is cursed with another Bush.
Thursday at 21:53 ·
Prabaharan Gandhi
Prabaharan Gandhi
whether one use or not ,why one should be allowed to hold,what makes others fear.UNO should be firm on that.
Thursday at 21:59 ·
Sunil Kelkar
Sunil Kelkar
Next, Pakistan will be forced to use its nukes against its own people in Waziristan. Then Pakistan will obviously blame it on India.
Thursday at 22:13 ·
Prabaharan Gandhi
Prabaharan Gandhi
These type of human hazardous weapons must be viewed seriously and brought under control in no time.
Thursday at 22:19 ·
Mian Saleem
Mian Saleem
UN is not independent, it is an impotent organisaton only serves the purpose of the powerful and supress the weak. The threat of powerful culminates into acquiring Nuclear weapon by the weak.
Look what happened to flotilla - a civilain ship attacked by Israeli forces, and of course the people of Kashmir suffering for the last 60 years.
Let us not be emotional but be pragmatic in order to address the real issues.
Thursday at 22:20 ·
Mian Saleem
Mian Saleem
Sunil Yes -- just like India always blames ISI. Even a cow in India stops milk, it is because of ISI. I would now request Indian friends to grow up and dont be threatened by Pakistan.
Thursday at 22:24 ·
Mian Saleem
Mian Saleem
Starting first with India....Prabaharan!!
Thursday at 22:26 ·
Prabaharan Gandhi
Prabaharan Gandhi
If father of our nation Gandhiji can influence the entire world ,then there will be some strategy available ,which we have to find out.if many countries join united in the issue ,then many will be forced to put down their harmful weapons.
Thursday at 22:30 ·
Ajay Chrungoo
Ajay Chrungoo
India abdicated its nuclear supperiority, it abdicated its nuclear parity, it is also in the process of abondoning the concept of deterrance. Next is alredy unfolding. Even principality large countries like Maldives are now offering its services to mediate between India and Pakistan.
Thursday at 22:37 ·
Sajad Shaheen
Sajad Shaheen
heading towards a disaster Malini.
Thursday at 23:11 ·
Baljinder Singh Jassal
Baljinder Singh Jassal
This is a international politics i think we should not involve in it
Thursday at 23:14 ·
Prabaharan Gandhi
Prabaharan Gandhi
may be weapon sale and keeping people always under threat.
Thursday at 23:16 ·
Sanju Gangolli
Sanju Gangolli
ALL THIS SHOULD CHANGE AND WILL CHANGE,
WE CAN ONLY PRAY FOR WORLD PEACE
ALL HAVE THEIR OWN OPINION GOOD THIS WAY WE CAN UNDERSTAND EACH OTHER WELL
Thursday at 23:22 ·
Inder Bisht
Inder Bisht
hello malini..i think we should think of peace instead ..the example of japan is in front of all of us..whatever be the intentions of others but ...nuclear weapons are not good for anyone..lets hope for universal nuclear disarmament..coz a single mistake could wipe off everything ...from this place we call our planet...for the time being let this ... See moredebate be in the safe hands of experts..and what really matters is the conventional military power and effective intelligence to counter the enemy , which i think india is more than capable of achieving
Thursday at 23:24 ·
Prabaharan Gandhi
Prabaharan Gandhi
Media should come out with more fact ,so this humanity problem will be taken note and care by every one.
Thursday at 23:28 ·
Ananda Shanker Chaudhury
Ananda Shanker Chaudhury
Funny thing is that the nuclear arsenal is built in order to ensure peace. Peace at what price. This shows lack of trust and absence of love.
Thursday at 23:34 ·
Inder Bisht
Inder Bisht
hello mr MIAN...lets not bring kashmir into this debate...even you don't know what exactly happened 63 years back...history and fate plays their own role..and the reality is kashmir is a part of india for the last 63 years like balochistan and lahore are pakistan's...but to cry over it again and again and to govern a country over this single issue ... See moreby neglecting others..is indeed the biggest achievement of pakistani state and military...if you are so concerned about kashmir and palestine than why you are not talking about srilanka..why pak govt is supplying defence equipment to sri lanka..why you don't show the same sympathetic attitude towards LTTE...just becoz they are kaafirs..
Thursday at 23:36 ·
Zaheer Abbas
Zaheer Abbas
What this debate is, some one attacked america nd that country never let it happen again this is why they deserve to rule the world.we can not save our pyjama we blame others,we have to make us strong so none can harm us.
Yesterday at 00:51 ·
Zaheer Abbas
Zaheer Abbas
Nd malini u r staying at usa nd nadia at eng nd debating at issue while spending lavish life out there leaving ur respective country whose even simple water if u drink will hospitalised u. do some concrete
For ur country help a poor child
Yesterday at 01:05 ·
Haider Abbasi
Haider Abbasi
what a write nadia u r
Yesterday at 02:28 ·
Anil G Rao
Anil G Rao
HI ALL
MY BIG QUESTION IS IN INDIA TO HANG A TERRORIST ITS TAKES DECADES , SO THE NEIGHBORING COUNTRY ARE ALWAYS READY WITH THERE WEAPON .

DONT THINK ENEMYS ARE STRONGER THEN OUR FORCE .
OUR SOLDERS ARE WOUNDED TIGERS .... See more

TIME WILL GIVE THE ANSWER ITS LAND OF MAHABHARATH .
Yesterday at 02:48 ·
Jugal K Malpani
Jugal K Malpani
Stop this madness. We do not need Weapons, we need water,shelter, food,education on both sides of the border. Encouraging Militancy on either side is harmful to common people. Neither India nor Pakistan has eliminated illetracy, we wont talk about educating the masses. Without Quality of- education of arts, sciences, management, and Technology- our... See more progress will be slower We are one of the most corrupt countries in the world, Our women even get less of every thing. Terrorist do not kill as many as we kill innocent female fetuses. We treat our fellow human beings worse than animals( servants, People barely making ends meet, waiters, bus drivers, our car drivers).

Both sides can do a better job. Let your heart tell you which side is doing a better job or what parts of the individual countries are doing a better job.

I am not sure if A bombs will be ever used again but if you are economically sound the rest will be taken care of. And I do not mean not defend yourself or be weak.

China is going to each our lunches if they progres and we only slowly.

Thanks you
Yesterday at 03:21 ·
Jugal K Malpani
Jugal K Malpani
See what happened to USSR
Yesterday at 03:22 ·
Anil G Rao
Anil G Rao
Mr jugal dont think past
Yesterday at 03:30 ·
Jugal K Malpani
Jugal K Malpani
@Anilji please explain what do you mean by past ?
Yesterday at 04:21 ·
Anil G Rao
Anil G Rao
Mr jugal ji i agree your words but iam not agree to think past what happened in ussr . because they have not suffer like Us no doubt situation are alike but we have both cunning neighboring hood . here we must take some disciplinary action against them other wise we loose it once again .
Yesterday at 04:27 ·
Anil G Rao
Anil G Rao
Mr jugal ji if we built nice sweet home we put all kind of security gates and monitors and recorders . why dont we need a weapon to protect our mother land ?
Yesterday at 04:36 ·
Bishwa Nath Singh
Bishwa Nath Singh
Though Malini Ji is a genius but she should not forget that Govt. of India especially our Defense Ministry is well-versed with all these details and preparing hard to meet any eventualities. Though, I admire your concern that any true nationalist can have.
Yesterday at 04:42 ·
Aaditya Singh
Aaditya Singh
Nothings. All concerned powers will keep on working for a viable nuclear deterrence in every manner - militarily(primarily), politically, diplomatically,strategically and economically.
Yesterday at 08:27 ·
Bipul Choudhary
Bipul Choudhary
what a great statistics...excellent
Yesterday at 10:49 ·
Chitaranjan Gupta
Chitaranjan Gupta
Next 30 years like USSR and USA building arms and letting the country to......
Yesterday at 11:47 ·
Chitaranjan Gupta
Chitaranjan Gupta
Next 30 years like USSR and USA building arms and letting the country to......
Yesterday at 11:47 ·
Chavali Venkata Laxminarasimha Phani
Chavali Venkata Laxminarasimha Phani
i too not agree with with peace..shanti...we should be shroud enough to attack and finish our enemy...why can we be so soft...because of our attitude we are lagging behind and even in foreign countries our children and conmmunities are also facing due to this nature..why cann ot we be shrought and straight farward ..jusst attack over ur enemy and finish it then and there...
yes we require this ..
Yesterday at 12:08 ·
Inder Bisht
Inder Bisht
i think this topic is irrelevant..and inconclusive so we must move on
Yesterday at 12:15 ·
Anil Budhiraja
Anil Budhiraja
Its not a question of who has the bigger number of nuclear arsenols--the most important question who is going to use it first -to begin the destruction of mankind!!!!!
Yesterday at 12:17 ·
Chitaranjan Gupta
Chitaranjan Gupta
Sirs we all agree and disagree on FB but the point is their a Political Will with the intellect. We are still dependedent on the non intellect mandate.... When we cannot put up a strong front with minor issues with Canada and USA airlines breaching protocol with our ex-presedent Dr Abdul Kalam..... ypou are talking of something bigger.
Yesterday at 12:17 ·
Chitaranjan Gupta
Chitaranjan Gupta
How do you trust fanatics with Nuclear arsonel... You cannot even trust them with simple guns..
Yesterday at 12:22 ·
Mahesh Kaul
Mahesh Kaul
Indian state is perhaps the only state in the comity of nations that believes the defense and safeguard of the frontiers and the borders is not of relevance.That is why India is the most vulnerable state having no strategy go pose a formidable counter to the aggressive and belligerent neighboring counties.Leave aside the nuclear capability Indian ... See morestate is always hell bent to demoralize its defense forces when they counter the terrorist threats in states like Jammu and Kashmir.Pity the nation.the conclusion is clear cut that the Indian state is in conflict with the Indian nation and hence Indian civilization.that is why there are contradictions in all policies and the nation appears to be on the back foot in terms of defending the national frontiers.
Yesterday at 13:17 ·
Birendra Sona
Birendra Sona
Albert Einsten 4th World War> Stick and Stone
Yesterday at 13:19 ·
ArunVerma Aayvee
ArunVerma Aayvee
its dangerous for global peace
Yesterday at 13:21 ·
Sumit Singh
Sumit Singh
u r right...
Yesterday at 13:39 ·
Devender Kumar
Devender Kumar
Very nice and inquisitive discussion. Thanks everyone, specially MALINI
Yesterday at 17:04 ·
Jugal K Malpani
Jugal K Malpani
@Anilji, I do not disagree that you have to have strong defense for national interests. What I am trying to convey is that you still try for peace while protecting your interest. But finally the countries with overall economic conditions of their people will survive That is exactly what happened with USSR disintegration due to their economic ... See moreweakness. Russia is smaller now, less of threat to US. Berlin wall came down. Politics lok at national interests , Chinese were despised by all Americans, and what did Nixon do was to make ties with China for national interest. The international relations are dynamic and keep changing example Germany, USA, USSR, China.

As far as security for you nice sweat house is considered , it depends whether you need sophisticated security or simple lock and key and no locks at all- it varies from place to place. We do not always lock our house, keep doors open in our absence,, allow repair people to go in and out without our presence, keeps the doors and windows open in night for fresh air.But that is our neighborhood. I do not think I can do that in Numbai or Delhi or New York.

So yes if you need Arms of any kind for national interest it is understandable in the real world, but what a country makes strong is its over all vitality, economic strength,democracy, equal rights for all, educated masses, etc.

Sorry for the long response
Yesterday at 18:08 ·
Karthik Iyer
Karthik Iyer
Send One Pakistani to Moon, new problem
Send Group of Pakistanis to Moon Bigger Moon Problem
Send All The Pakistanis to Moon, Well Earths biggest problem is solved
Yesterday at 18:24 ·
Jugal K Malpani
Jugal K Malpani
@ Karthik it is a cruel joke. We should not condemn or hate any Nationality people, it does not do any good. There are good and bad people all over world. No country has all good or bad people. Hatred brings back hatred only.

Example how would you feel if they call all south Asians Pakis, pr comment on Indian Women wearing Bindi- and Dot Busters attacking law abiding citizena in other countries.
Yesterday at 19:30 ·
Malini Shreedharan
Malini Shreedharan
Thank you all for being part of this fantastic debate. In nutshell, no one knows what is our future, anything can happen..the days are so dangerous and risky. natural calamities, naxalisms, accidents, new emerging diseases, stress. and treats are going to kill us!
Yesterday at 21:51 ·
Kuldeep Bhat
Kuldeep Bhat
@MS,All this has always been there;natural calamities,thuggery,accidents,old chronic diseases;yet humans lived on.At least v r more informed,more intelligent,more secure-economically o otherwise.There shd b no pessimism.V will take care o ourselves better than v were at any stage in the past!!!!
19 hours ago ·
Natarajan Venkataraman
Natarajan Venkataraman
Compare the area of india with that of pakistan. They need much more war heads to match India. Few war heads from India are enough to destroy the whole of pakistan. Our real threat is from China.
10 hours ago ·
Bhoogi Jogi
Bhoogi Jogi
defence is first priority ...national security...
7 hours ago ·
Karthik Iyer
Karthik Iyer
@jugal,
We are in the denail mode , thereis no problem, The fact is all the terror in India are happening because of pakistan, so many persons like you and me are collateral damage to the Paks. If Pakistani paper raises to support India, I have not see it.Only the hatred comes out of it.If The choice is between Indians and Paks , I dont care how many of them dead.
5 hours ago ·